• 2009-05-23

    【Discuss】Should We Make Art Skillful? - [Notes on ART]

    版权声明:转载时请以超链接形式标明文章原始出处和作者信息及本声明
    http://www.blogbus.com/annsart-logs/39790715.html

    While I keep practising my idea about MicroShow, a question also keep bouncing in my mind.

    Should Art be such Skillful? OR Should we make Art Skillful?

    豆瓣线上活动@ Online Forum:http://www.douban.com/online/10168734/

    随着艺术的形式多样化和范围的扩张,艺术的外貌的地位逐渐已经慢慢攀升,甚至逾越了一件艺术品本身的意义这个层次。不是我对于艺术品美感的争辩,只是对于艺术的存在的意义是否仅仅是简单的被欣赏产生质疑。

    艺术的使用价值,和艺术的观赏价值,甚至于更深刻的艺术对于外界的影响都在不同程度上对于接受艺术产品的人们产生着互动。如果把艺术的价值仅仅局限于客观的审美或者实用性上,那么可以产生两种后果,一种是艺术打破了所谓的高端,第二种是艺术只存在于高端。

    As the media and range of Art expands dramatically, it seems like Art's apparance has climbed to a more significant position than it used to be. Or we can say, than the meanings that one art object holds. This is not a critism or a debate about esthetics of Art, but a discussion about the way that Art exists in the society, about its role and function. If Art is just a simple object that people focus more on its pratical and appreciation value, then should we question about the existance of Art?

    On the other hand, the pratical value and the appearance of Art, and the social or public influences (e.g. educational) of Art all need to be combined in order to generate an interaction function.

     

    About the art, I cannot conclude it as a way to express feelings or thoughts of artists, or a way to receive appreciation from viewers. It is more about thinking patten and reflections. Both of these two stuff will expand the space.


    我所想到的艺术 无法归结为一种表现形式

    思考 和 发问 会延展出更多的空间

    分享到:

    评论

  • welcome to china!我刚看到你在798的留言,我想我们可能是同行,并且我们的理想可能一样,艺术是自由的。我在苏州,和我联系
    就加我的QQ号962876467,我邮箱被黑了